Are Starlings the Key to Making Guam’s Forests Sing Again?

Decades after the brown tree snake wiped out Guam鈥檚 birds, biologists have an ambitious plan to bring native species back to the stunning island.

The forests of Guam are eerily quiet. Ever since birds disappeared a few decades ago, only the hum of insects and rustling of leaves float on the humid air of this 210-square-mile island in the Western Pacific Ocean. If a bold avian reintroduction project is successful, however, the mountainous terrain might once again brim with song.

The story behind Guam鈥檚 near-silent forests is a classic in the annals of ecological invasion. It begins , when brown tree snakes hitched a ride on U.S. military craft from Manus Island in Papua New Guinea. The reptiles, which can grow up to eight feet long and have a native range from Australia to the nearby region of Melanesia, multiplied and ate their way through Guam鈥檚 avifauna. By the time biologists grasped the problem in the 1980s, snakes had rendered 13 of the island鈥檚 22 breeding birds extinct in the wild, including six endemics. The 12 forest species were hit especially hard, with only the Island Swiftlet and Micronesian Starling still clinging to existence on the snake-free grounds of a U.S. Air Force base. Others, such as the Guam Rail and Guam Kingfisher, survive only through captive-breeding programs.

Iowa State University biologist Haldre Rogers and her team some of those lost species鈥攁nd in doing so, help rebuild the larger ecosystem. In the absence of birds, Guam鈥檚 karst limestone forests, which cover a third of the island, have changed 颅significantly. The density of cobwebs can be up to 40 times greater on birdier isles, hinting that spiders鈥攚hich compete with avian predators鈥攏ow overrun the woods. Many plants, meanwhile, have declined. Seventy percent of tree species, including the 颅berry-packed 颅氓plokhateng and 氓hgao, rely on birds to gorge on their fruits and spread the seeds far and wide. (Some are up to four times likelier to germinate after passing through a bird鈥檚 gut.) Rogers found that because of the snakes, the number of seedlings for two common species plummeted by as much as 92 percent, thinning once dense canopies.

By the time biologists grasped the problem, snakes had rendered 13 of the island鈥榮 22 breeding birds extinct in the wild.

Enter the Micronesian Starling. Known locally , it鈥檚 a glossy black bird with a yellow eye and a clear song. 鈥淚t鈥檚 probably the most effective fruit disperser of the birds that used to be here,鈥 Rogers says. 鈥淭his means it鈥檚 the best candidate for restoring ecosystem function.鈥

Historically widespread, in 2016 fewer than 1,000 Sali survived on Guam. As cavity nesters, the birds are easy pickings for the tree-bound snakes. So the first step in bolstering their numbers was to protect the starlings until chicks fledge. Rogers鈥檚 collaborators hit upon a simple solution: They hung PVC nest boxes on poles too slippery for the reptiles to scale. Since they installed the contraptions around Andersen Air Force Base in 2015, 589 young have fledged.

The next stage is to build new boxes鈥攚ith help from Guamanian students in shop classes鈥斅璷utside of the friendly confines of the base. That鈥檚 at least a year off and a considerable challenge, given that 2 million brown tree snakes still slither around the island. The population has been stable since the 1990s, despite localized eradication efforts that include , which is toxic to reptiles.

鈥淪nakes are definitely still a concern,鈥 says Rogers. But she is not content to wait while communities of trees wither without their birds. Even if a fraction of the young starlings make it to adulthood, it will help stem, and maybe even reverse, the decline of swaths of forest. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a small step,鈥 Rogers says. 鈥淏ut an important one to produce a functioning, more diverse ecosystem.鈥

Her hope is that ultimately the lessons her team learns from the starlings can pave the way to reintroduce the Guam Kingfisher, another cavity nester that鈥檚 and other U.S.-based institutions. Like the Sali, they鈥檙e waiting in the wings, ready to come back home.

Correction: The chewed-up fruits in photo no. 5 were originally misidentified as being left behind by fruit bats. Some captions were also edited to clarify that the nest boxes were designed and installed by a separate team from Colorado State University.

This story originally ran in the Winter 2018 issue as 鈥淚sland of Silence.鈥 To receive our print magazine, become a member by听.