And the Birding Oscar Goes To . . .

It鈥檚 not just about the acting. Find out which film should win based on accurate bird depictions alone.

Once you鈥檙e a birder, you鈥檙e always birding. There is no off switch. Who knows when a rare bird will fly by or sing out? Birds don鈥檛 care whether you鈥檙e ready for them, so you need to be alert! Driving? Birding. Attending an outdoor wedding ceremony as a guest...or member of the wedding party itself? Birding. In a boring work meeting with a window? Definitely birding.

And of course, you鈥檙e birding while watching movies or TV. Once you start identifying the sights and sounds of birds in the real world, you can鈥檛 help but identify them on screen. Just be prepared for disappointment.

Birds in movies are almost always incorrect. I don鈥檛 know why it鈥檚 true, but it鈥檚 true. Bald Eagle calls are always actually Red-tailed Hawks (even David Attenborough is !). Birds show up in . Birds calling in the background of scenes are almost always inappropriate for the setting, in anything from to . And please, do not even get me started on .

It鈥檚 irritating to see and hear so many bird-related mistakes on screen because it just doesn鈥檛 need to happen. You鈥檙e pouring millions of dollars into this production and you can鈥檛 open a field guide to make sure the bird you鈥檙e using fits the scene? To a birder, hearing or seeing an out-of-place bird is like seeing an SUV in a Civil War drama.

On the other hand, correct use of birds on film is an indication of quality, attention to detail, and craftsmanship. In my mind, the accurate deployment of birds and bird sounds tends to signify great care in all other areas, and is a good predictor of a good film.

So, what about Best Pictures? The Academy Awards are this weekend, and in preparation I watched all eight movies nominated for best picture, keeping an eye and ear out for birds. In case you forgot, the nominated films are The Big Short, Bridge of Spies, Brooklyn, Mad Max: Fury Road, The Martian, The Revenant, Room, and Spotlight. Here鈥檚 how they did.

Wait, first, some quick disclaimers. There鈥檒l be some **SPOILERS** below. It鈥檚 unavoidable, but I鈥檒l do my best to not give anything away that I don鈥檛 need to. Second, I can鈥檛 vouch for the total accuracy of what鈥檚 to come. I saw most of these films in the theater, without the luxury of a rewind button. I did the best I could to ID birds that were only seen or heard briefly or faintly, so there may be things I鈥檝e missed. Go watch them for yourselves and argue with me in the comments if I messed up.

Bridge of Spies and Spotlight

All right, let鈥檚 get started with two films in a category by themselves: movies with no birds in them at all. Despite my careful watching, I couldn鈥檛 see a single flutter or hear a solitary chirp in either movie. Neither has a lot of outdoor scenes, so I guess it makes sense, but it鈥檚 still disappointing to get no avian representation whatsoever.

But a question emerges: Is it better for a movie to have birds but use them incorrectly, or to have no birds at all? I asked Twitter, and things were pretty well split.

I think a complete lack of birds should neither add nor detract from the candidacy of these movies as the category winner. If either wins (Spotlight was great, Bridge of Spies was boring), it鈥檒l be on other merits.

Score: 0 bonus bird points. (Best Picture is determined via a point system, right? It鈥檚 not? Oh. Well, too bad.)

The Martian and Room

Birds appear on the soundtrack of both of these films, and are similarly employed. The bird sounds in these films are used symbolically to represent the very idea of life. When 搁辞辞尘鈥s Jack is taken out of the titular shed, the first thing you hear is a bird chirping (though I couldn鈥檛 make out the species). The first scene showing The Martian鈥檚 astronaut Mark Watney back on Earth after a harrowing escape from the Red Planet is scored with Tufted Titmouse, Acadian Flycatcher, and Red-bellied Woodpecker calls in the background. Both these scenes depict characters seeing the natural world for the first time in a long time, and birds are how that idea is hammered home.

Though both films use birds in the same way, they鈥檙e not equal. Room only has the one brief call. I heard three different species in The Martian, each one appropriate for the Houston setting. Well done.  

Scores: +5 bonus bird points for Room; +25 for The Martian.

Brooklyn and The Big Short

Two very good films with solid use of birds. I counted three birds in The Big Short: some species of thrush singing at the very beginning, a quick close-up shot of a House Sparrow, and some species of dark-backed gull out a window in one shot. Nothing incorrect, but nothing particularly impressive, either. (Could have switched that close-up from a House Sparrow to a Le Conte鈥檚 Sparrow and we鈥檇 be in business.)

Brooklyn had a good number of birds, singing away. There were gulls calling on the boat trip from Ireland to the U.S. (I strained the horizon for Shearwaters with no luck.) There were appropriate Northern Cardinal and even Chimney Swift calls on the streets of New York. Unfortunately, there was a big mistake. Back in Ireland, during a scene in a graveyard, a flock of crows wheeling in the background was scored with the sound of American Crows. Bummer. It鈥檚 otherwise an enchanting film, just cover your bird-sensitive ears at the graveyard scene.

Scores: +20 meaningless points for The Big Short, and +10 for Brooklyn.

The Revenant

There鈥檚 no doubt that more birds show up in The Revenant鈥攂oth onscreen and on the soundtrack鈥攖han any other Best Picture nominee. Unfortunately, they鈥檙e almost all wrong. The film is set in what is to become South Dakota in winter. . . so why is a Yellow-billed Cuckoo chattering during the bear attack scene? Why is there a Common Loon calling? Only the Blue Jays heard during the scene where Hugh Glass is being taken up a mountain on a stretcher is remotely plausible.

But those weren鈥檛 the only birds heard in the film. I鈥檓 no expert in the calls of UK birds, but Alex Lees () tweeted about hearing a Greenfinch, Grasshopper Warbler, and Black Hawk-eagle. Henry Cook () said he heard a Coal Tit. Inexcusable.

That鈥檚 not all. Another scene begins panning down from the treetops, and a big bird has been CGI鈥檇 onto a branch in the foreground. It鈥檚 supposed to be a Common Raven, but its beak is too big and its face looks weird. No.

I wanted to like this movie, but I just didn鈥檛. Give Leo his Best Actor Award if you must, but this ain鈥檛 no Best Picture.

Score: -100 bird points.

Mad Max: Fury Road

My favorite movie of the year is also the only one, by my count, to include the name of a bird in the script. In one scene the Furiosa-led caravan of escapees and survivors drives through a swampy hellscape featuring weird stilt-people and a whole bunch of crows. Later, it鈥檚 revealed that the swamp was actually ruins of the promised Green Place, no longer a refuge. 鈥淭he crows,鈥 Furiosa says as the truth is revealed, 鈥渢he creepy place with all the crows.鈥

Hey! They said crows! Never mind that unlike in The Martian and Room these birds symbolize death and destruction, they鈥檙e major plot points! Plus, other than the two-headed lizard in the opening scene, these crows are the only non-human characters in the whole film. They鈥檙e survivors, is what I鈥檓 saying. Even though there are no other birds or bird calls in the movie, the out-loud bird mention puts it in a birdy class by itself.

I loved Mad Max because it was the most unique and exciting film of all the nominees. What鈥檚 more, it not only put birds on screen but it also put them in the script. What more could I ask for?

Score: +100 bonus bird points, and Best Picture Winner!