How Island Birds Got Their Groove

Species that live on small islands often barely resemble their mainland kin, thanks to evolution.

It was 180 years ago this month when a young Charles Darwin first stepped onto the Gal谩pagos Islands. He would soon come to realize that he had landed in a place of many curiosities鈥攁 laboratory cut off from the rest of the world, with creatures that had evolved faster than those on the mainland, sometimes in ways that could only be described as bizarre.

Nearly two centuries later, Darwin鈥檚 discoveries about evolution are abundantly confirmed by scientists studying species on other remote islands. J. Albert Uy, the Aresty Chair in Tropical Ecology at the University of Miami, is one of them. He coauthored a recent paper in  about variations among birds on the Solomon Islands, a chain of hundreds of isles northeast of Australia. 鈥淭ypically the top predators are missing and the competition is relaxed, so you get all of these trajectories that aren鈥檛 possible on a crowded continent,鈥 he says of islands. These 鈥渢rajectories鈥 include darker colors, loss of flight, mega-growth, shrinkage, and docile behavior. Here are some examples.

Melanism

On small islands, even the most colorful birds, like Bananaquits in the Caribbean and White-winged Fairy-wrens off the western coast of Australia, occasionally go dark. (Mammals, reptiles, and insects exhibit this trait, too.) In some cases, the extra melanin is thought to help them regulate their body temperatures or blend in with their surroundings. As Uy points out, melanin also makes feathers sturdier, which is especially advantageous on islands, since birds there are more exposed to the elements. 鈥淭hey can withstand not just physical damage better,鈥 he says, 鈥渂ut also feather-degrading microbes better.鈥 

Uy has spent nearly a decade studying the Chestnut-bellied Monarch, a bluebird-sized songbird endemic to the Solomon Islands. His research uncovered another characteristic of dark-feathered individuals鈥攁ggression. In 2009 Uy and his team observed that pure-black monarchs, a variant of the species, greet threats from other monarchs  than chestnut-bellied ones. The group鈥檚 latest research further reveals that smaller islands in the Solomons have a higher percentage of black birds than larger islands. The takeaway: Because small islands have such a limited supply of breeding territories, the darker, more aggressive birds are successful there.

Flightlessness

To get to an island, a bird鈥檚 going to use its wings. But once it lands there, it might find few predators. Which is why, over the span of many generations, species like the Gal谩pagos鈥 Flightless Cormorant, the Guam Rail, and New Zealand鈥檚 Kakapo have lost the ability to fly. 鈥淚t鈥檚 really metabolically expensive for birds to maintain their flight muscles,鈥 says Alison G. Boyer, an ecology professor at the University of Tennessee. Without them, 鈥淸they] can put more of their energy toward reproduction, or maintaining their own body, or growing a little bit faster or bigger.鈥

Unfortunately, flightlessness becomes a major disadvantage once humans arrive, especially when they bring rats, cats, and livestock with them. In a , Boyer estimated that human colonization of the Pacific islands caused the extinction of nearly 1,000 bird species鈥攁nd that doesn鈥檛 even include songbirds or seabirds. She also found that flightless species were 33 times more likely to go extinct than those that get airborne.

Gigantism 

When birds fly, they try to keep it light. Even the heaviest of the aerial species, the Kori and Great bustards, are just 40 pounds鈥攁bout the weight of a five-gallon jug of water. But when a bird no longer needs its wings, the pounds can start to pile on. New Zealand鈥檚 extinct moas, for instance, grew to 12 feet tall and more than 500 pounds; they were hunted to extinction around 1400 A.D. The elephant birds of Madagascar, also extinct, were mammoths as well. (Since moas and elephant birds didn鈥檛 have any large mammals around them, they moved into the megafauna niche occupied by four-legged grazers on the mainland.) Among birds that still exist, Boyer says, perhaps the best example of gigantism is the Takah膿 of New Zealand鈥檚 South Island. Though it averages only about six pounds, this species is believed to have evolved from much smaller ancestors to become the world鈥檚 largest rail.

No one knows why some island species get so enormous. One conjecture holds that birds with bigger bodies can ferment food in their guts the way cows do, allowing them to eat harder-to-digest plants. Other theories suggest that larger creatures usually live longer, can survive harsher weather, and require less food pound-for-pound because of their slower metabolisms.

Dwarfism

The general rule of island evolution is that big animals get smaller and small animals get bigger. This trend is most commonly seen in mammals: To account for the limited resources on islands, the key deer of the Florida Keys, the extinct pygmy hippos of Madagascar, the extinct dwarf elephants of various Mediterranean islands, and even the so-called , an Indonesian island, all became miniaturized versions of their mainland relatives.

Because most birds are tiny, avian dwarfism is virtually unheard of. The exception: two extinct types of emus that lived off the coast of Australia. 鈥淭he situation of an emu miniaturizing on an island is really, really unique,鈥 Boyer says. 鈥淓mus are already very atypical for birds, so you can basically use the mammalian hypothesis for dwarfism to explain why they do the same thing.鈥

Fearlessness

Back in 1835, Darwin was amazed at the tameness of the species on the Gal谩pagos. He sat on the backs of giant tortoises, pulled the tails of marine iguanas, and even had birds land on his hands. In one case, he pointed his gun at a hawk and used the muzzle to push it off its perch. 鈥淎 gun is here almost superfluous,鈥 . Other early explorers shared similar stories from other island chains, including Hawaii and New Zealand.

These animals could afford to be oblivious because they had very few predators鈥攖hat is, until humans showed up and started killing them. 鈥淭hey could not evolve fast enough to regain their defense mechanisms,鈥 Boyer says. The Dodo, which lived on Mauritius, is a classic and tragic example of this. Not only was it tame; it was also flightless, large, and easy to find. 鈥淧eople could essentially just walk up to them and pick them up or hit them on the head,鈥 Boyer says. By the mid-1600s, just a few decades after Europeans colonized Mauritius, the Dodo was extinct.