U.S. Court Upholds Airports’ Right to Legally Kill Snowy Owls and Other Birds

A new ruling seals a 2014 decision that permits the Port Authority to sidestep the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey now has the legal right to kill almost any bird on its property鈥攁s long as they declare it an emergency.

After a two-year battle with the animal rights group Friends of Animals, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided to uphold a 2014 decision that allowed the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to exterminate birds that flock on their grounds. That's because 鈥渕igratory birds that congregate near airports pose a well-known threat to human safety,鈥 the  state. The documents cite near-catastrophes like the between two Canada Geese and a Concorde jet, and the in the Hudson River, prompted by a flock of geese, as backup. Though no one was killed in either incident鈥攁side from the birds鈥攖here were .

The right-to-kill case dates back to December 2013, when at John F. Kennedy International Airport. Friends of Animals then sued the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, pointing out that the owls would have been a better alternative. The group also claimed that killing the birds was a violation of the (NEPA), which requires federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of any proposed action, as well as the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which prevents the hunting and killing of most birds in the United States. (There are exceptions to the MBTA鈥擴SFWS  to people or organizations to bypass the MBTA rules in order to go hunting, for instance.) The Port Authority has had such a permit since 1994鈥攊t鈥檚 allowed to take down 18 species of bird that compromise public safety via their potential to ground planes. The loophole in the loophole, however, is the 鈥渆mergency take鈥 provision in this permit, which allows airports to exterminate almost any migratory bird that 鈥減oses a direct threat to human safety.鈥 The only birds that are exempt are Bald Eagles, Golden Eagles, and other endangered or threatened species. 

So does this mean Snowy Owls and other favorite species have to learn to steer clear of these properties? Maybe not. Susan Elbin, director of conservation and science at New York City 探花精选, says that despite the court's ruling, she's confident the Port Authority will try to avoid killing birds. "I know for a fact that they'll only use lethal control as a last resort. They spend days and days meeting about this subject and catching these birds," she says. In fact, the Port Authority often consults with NYC 探花精选 about methods for handling wildlife. "It鈥檚 unfortunate when wildlife and humans come into this conflict situation where they鈥檙e trying to share space鈥攁nd that鈥檚 often what happens with airports鈥攂ut I know that the Port Authority is doing their best to trap and relocate them."

In a , Priscilla Feral, president of Friends with Animals, said she was disappointed by the court鈥檚 judgement. 鈥淭he decision to kill three Snowy Owls was blind and irrational and needed to be challenged. We don鈥檛 like this ruling but it won鈥檛 discourage us from holding these agencies鈥 feet to the fire next time.鈥