Birds do a lot for us鈥攂eyond being easy on the eyes, their assistance in the pollination process helps ensure that we humans have enough food to eat. But more pollinating insects, birds, and other animals are going extinct today than ever before, according to a released last week by the (IPBES), an international conservation task force. And without immediate action to protect those species, it warns, the global food supply could be decimated.
About 16.5 percent of bird and mammal pollinators (that includes bats, marsupials, monkeys, lemurs and rodents) are currently threatened with extinction, while more than 40 percent of pollinating insects鈥攅specially bees and butterflies鈥攁re similarly threatened, according to the task force of about 80 experts, which met in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to release the report.
The Repercussions of Losing Pollinators
The loss of these creatures would have a reverberating effect on the Earth鈥檚 plant life鈥攁nimals pollinate nearly 90 percent of the world鈥檚 plants and at least 75 percent of food crops, . Crops used for biofuels, fibers, craft and construction materials, medicine, and livestock feed are also dependent on pollinators to successfully reproduce.
The decimation of these animals may limit the availability of crops that depend on pollination, such as apples, broccoli, and almonds, and make humans more dependent on crops that don鈥檛 require pollination, such as corn and carrots, or those that can be pollinated by wind and water, such as tomatoes and eggplant.
鈥淭o maintain the wide variety of foods we need to stay healthy, we need pollinators,鈥 says , deputy chief for research at the USDA Forest Service and an author of the IPBES study.
Some of the major causes of pollinator species losses include habitat loss, pesticide use, climate change and industrial agricultural practices鈥攅specially the planting of large-scale monocultures, says , an author of the IPBES report and professor emeritus of biology at the University of Maryland.
While somber in its predictions, the researchers behind the IPBES report are hopeful it will compel people to help pollinators. Already, the Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Agriculture are working on a to better protect the health of pollinators, including monitoring pollinator populations, restoring their natural habitat and protecting them from pesticides. Individuals can also help boost pollinator populations by planting flowers that attract pollinators and being cautious when using pesticides.
What Do Birds Have to Do With It?
鈥淏ees are clearly the most important pollinators,鈥 says , an author of the IPBES report and professor of Ecology and Evolution at the University of California, Santa Barbara. 鈥淗owever, hummingbirds, orioles, and a variety of other flower-visiting birds do provide pollination service, although primarily to wildflowers.鈥
Worldwide, there are about 2,000 species of pollinating birds, , including honeycreepers, honeyeaters, sunbirds, and some parrots. The birds help fertilize plants in the same way as any other pollinator鈥攂y transferring pollen (via their bills) from one flower to another as they flit between plants feeding on nectar. Bird pollination mainly occurs in tropical regions, where they help pollinate a few food crops, including bananas, papaya and nutmeg.
There are no North American commercial crops that require birds for pollination鈥攊n this ecosystem birds primarily pollinate wildflowers. The decimation of these wildflower habitats, largely thanks to monoculture agriculture, has also hurt pollinating bird species.
鈥淲hile we may not eat the wildflowers birds pollinate, those plants are important for the health of the global ecosystem as a whole,鈥 says , senior principle consultant at The Biodiversity Consultancy, a UK-based environmental risk-assessment firm. Regan is lead author of on pollinating species populations, published last year.
What鈥檚 more, it turns out IPBES may have underestimated the number of birds and other pollinating species at risk of extinction.
鈥淭he members of IPBES are the best minds we have, but the data they鈥檝e used was already quite old by the time they made their assessment,鈥 says Regan. 鈥淭he situation for birds could be much worse鈥攂ut that鈥檚 all the more reason to start protecting them, and other pollinators, now.鈥